Revenue Model
Our revenue model stands out from other platforms as we don't rely on a single source of income. With multiple product features within our platform, we have diversified our income streams. Firstly, there are inherent fees generated from our role as the primary liquidity provider. Additionally, we generate fees from swap transactions on our DEX. For lending services, OrangeDX imposes a fee that is a percentage of the interest earned by lenders, or alternatively, it engages in profit-sharing arrangements. Similarly, a fee is charged on borrowing, calculated as a percentage of the total amount borrowed.
Furthermore, we have income sources from hosting Initial DEX Offerings (IDOs), Initial NFT Offerings (INOs) and Initial Liquidity Offering on our launch hub. Also, our platform has spread trading and arbitration opportunities through our DEX aggregator, which entail corresponding fees. On the other hand, the perpetual DEX would generate fees from users doing perpetual trading since the platform is the primary liquidity provider in the single-sided liquidity pool.
One more revenue factory is our cross-chain Bridge which would generate fee revenue consistently as long as there are users bridging over through our Bridge. The higher the TVL, the more substantial the revenue for OrangeDX, implying that as more value moves into the system, the platform's earnings increase.
In the future, with mass adoption and high web traffic, we may explore running ads on our platform as an additional revenue stream. By that time we would have transitioned ourselves to a DAO and governance participation and protocol operation also entail fees. Additionally, we could earn by offering white-label solutions of our products to high-level project clients, further diversifying our income sources and ensuring the sustainability of our platform.
Last updated